Reposted by Michael Shellenberger
The statement criticizes major Brazilian newspapers for allegedly not covering a specific issue ('Vaza Toga parte 2') that involves accusations of illegal conduct by authorities. It suggests that the media is complicit in a regime that suppresses dissent, implying a lack of press freedom and transparency.
- The statement does not directly harm individuals but could contribute to a broader narrative of distrust in media institutions, which may indirectly cause harm by undermining public confidence. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does accuse media outlets of complicity in a regime, which could be seen as disrespectful to their integrity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it makes a broad accusation without providing evidence or inviting discussion. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech by criticizing media outlets, but it does so in a way that may not be responsible or constructive, as it lacks evidence and could contribute to misinformation. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.