Reposted by Michael Shellenberger
The statement addresses the concept of freedom of speech and critiques individuals who claim to support it but falter when faced with potential social disapproval. It suggests that true freedom of speech includes the right to offend, and criticizes 'supposed liberals' for not upholding this principle when it conflicts with their social group's approval.
- The statement does not explicitly strive to do no harm, as it emphasizes the right to cause offense, which could potentially harm others. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement engages in criticism of a group ('supposed liberals') but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on the perceived inconsistency in their stance on free speech. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech by advocating for the right to offend as part of free expression, but it does not address the responsibility and integrity aspect of using one's platform. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.