Michael Schellenberger

Rank 33 of 47
|
Score -35
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
8d
Yesterday we reported that a senior CIA analyst said Obama's CIA Director was "pathological" and put agency analysts "under duress" to use bogus intel. Today we report that the CIA remains corrupted by "systemic rot," and that crucial reforms "have not been put in place."
8/6/2025, 5:47:50 PM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
9d
Over the last month, the mainstream news media have dismissed the growing body of evidence that President Barack Obama’s CIA Director John Brennan, his Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, and his FBI Director James Comey worked together to manipulate intelligence,
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
9d
The media say Obama's CIA Dir. John Brennan didn't manipulate intelligence to frame Trump. But now, a top CIA analyst who coauthored the Jan. 2017 report on Russian interference reveals, for first time, that a "pathological" Brennan put analysts "under duress" to cook the intel.

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing allegations of misconduct within the intelligence community, specifically involving high-profile figures. It suggests manipulation of intelligence and systemic issues within the CIA, which are significant public concerns.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement could potentially cause harm by making serious allegations without providing evidence, which may damage reputations. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It may not fully respect the privacy and dignity of the individuals involved, as it labels them with negative terms without substantiated proof. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on accusations rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism, as it uses strong language and personal attacks rather than fostering dialogue. [-2]