Senior Official for Public Diplomacy
@UnderSecPD
·
8d
The statement is part of a public discourse as it engages with issues of censorship, human rights, and political dynamics in Brazil, specifically concerning Justice Moraes and former President Bolsonaro. The tone is critical and accusatory, suggesting that Moraes' actions are harmful to democracy and human rights.
- The statement implies harm by accusing Moraes of human rights abuses, which could be seen as harmful if not substantiated. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech but is critical of Moraes' actions.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it is accusatory and lacks a balanced perspective. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and could be seen as a personal attack on Moraes. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to highlight perceived injustices, which could be seen as an attempt to better society by advocating for free speech. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by criticizing censorship but must ensure accuracy and responsibility in its claims. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.