Reposted by Marianne Williamson
The statement claims that the U.S. government has removed sections of the Constitution without due process, which is a serious allegation that engages with public issues and concerns about governmental transparency and constitutional integrity.
- The statement could cause harm by spreading misinformation if the claim is false, as it may incite unnecessary panic or distrust in the government. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does not respect the dignity of public institutions by making unverified claims. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it presents a potentially inflammatory claim without context or evidence. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it presents an accusation without offering a platform for discussion or evidence. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not acknowledge or correct any mistakes, as it presents a claim without verification or follow-up. [-1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement uses influence to potentially mislead rather than for the betterment of society, as it could spread misinformation. [-2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement does not uphold the principles of free speech responsibly, as it makes a serious claim without evidence or integrity. [-2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.