Michael Schellenberger

The statement discusses alleged violations of religious freedom and peaceful assembly rights, referencing legal frameworks and specific incidents. It critiques actions perceived as infringing on these rights, suggesting a legal and ethical debate.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement aims to highlight potential harm caused by alleged violations of rights, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It respects privacy but could be seen as accusatory, which might border on disrespect if not substantiated. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement seeks to promote understanding of legal rights, aligning with empathy and compassion. [+1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   It engages in criticism of actions, which could be constructive if it leads to dialogue and resolution. [+1]
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses its platform to address societal issues, aiming for societal betterment. [+1]