Michael Schellenberger

The statement critiques the imposition of mandatory courses on democracy and anti-coup measures as a condition for certain legal benefits, suggesting it constitutes ideological coercion and forced reeducation. This engages in public discourse by addressing issues of freedom, legal conditions, and ideological influence.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement implies harm by suggesting coercion, which may not align with striving to do no harm. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It challenges the respect for privacy and dignity by implying forced ideological alignment. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, focusing instead on criticism. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   It engages in criticism but lacks constructive dialogue, focusing on negative implications. [-1]
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses its platform to raise awareness of perceived societal issues, aligning with using influence for societal betterment. [+1]