In reply to:
The statement defends the right to free speech, emphasizing loyalty to the Constitution over any administration. It responds to a suggestion that the Trump administration should penalize a university for an administrator's gesture, highlighting the importance of constitutional rights.
- The statement strives to do no harm by advocating for constitutional rights. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It promotes understanding and empathy by emphasizing the importance of free speech. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- Engages in constructive criticism by focusing on constitutional principles rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- Uses influence to advocate for the betterment of society by defending free speech. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.