In reply to:
Dr. Tororu
@DrTororu
·
108d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
108d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of military presence in American cities and the perception of crime in Washington, DC. It challenges the notion that DC is a 'war zone' by providing a counterpoint about crime rates.
- The statement does not use harmful language and aims to correct a potentially misleading narrative, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By providing factual information about crime rates, the statement promotes understanding and challenges fear-based rhetoric, aligning with the principle of promoting understanding and empathy. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by countering an argument with factual information rather than personal attacks, aligning with the principle of engaging in constructive dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform to responsibly address a public issue with integrity, aligning with the principle of upholding free speech responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.