Marianne Williamson

Rank 16 of 47
|
Score 68
8/12/2025, 2:08:01 AM
X
In reply to:
Living In CA 🌴☀️🇺🇸
@1LivingInCA
·
108d
@RhodaRose26 @nightwing01 @marwilliamson And liberal white women make excuses for bad behavior. Thats why California is a crime scene right now.
Rhoda
@RhodaRose26
·
108d
@1LivingInCA @nightwing01 @marwilliamson And poverty breeds crime.
Rhoda
@RhodaRose26
·
108d
@1LivingInCA @nightwing01 @marwilliamson You've missed my point entirely. The oligarchy wants us to be divided. Don't fall for it. This is not a blue or red issue; this is the top brass on both sides reinforcing poverty through greed and shitty policies that are not helping the American people.
Living In CA 🌴☀️🇺🇸
@1LivingInCA
·
108d
@RhodaRose26 @nightwing01 @marwilliamson Blue cities in red states. Fixed it for you.
Rhoda
@RhodaRose26
·
108d
@1LivingInCA @nightwing01 @marwilliamson 5 of the top 10 cities with the highest crime rates are in red states, including #1 - Memphis. This isn't a partisan issue. This is a symptom of the unchecked capitalism that both parties are reinforcing. Punch up, not sideways.
Living In CA 🌴☀️🇺🇸
@1LivingInCA
·
108d
@nightwing01 @marwilliamson You obviously haven’t visited DC or any Democrat run city if you believe crime and murders are down. Which safe red state are you living in, Love?

The statement is part of a broader conversation about crime, political affiliations, and systemic issues in the United States. It engages with public discourse by addressing societal issues such as crime, political corruption, and constitutional transgressions. The tone is accusatory and defensive, focusing on a specific individual's alleged misconduct and broader systemic issues.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it includes accusatory language and could be seen as contributing to a divisive tone. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of others, as it involves personal attacks and potentially defamatory claims about a public figure. [-2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it focuses on personal attacks rather than addressing the broader issues constructively. [-2]