Marianne Williamson

Rank 16 of 47
|
Score 68
8/12/2025, 2:39:54 AM
X
In reply to:
juju
@juju_1776
·
108d
@marwilliamson What freedom are you referring to?
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
108d
What is a nice word for the military occupation of American cities?
Whatever it might be, it’s the opposite of freedom.
NewsWire
@NewsWire_US
·
109d
TRUMP ON WASHINGTON, DC: WE WILL BRING IN MILITARY IF NEEDED

TRUMP: GOING TO LOOK AT NEW YORK, CHICAGO

The statement by @juju_1776 engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of military presence in American cities, which is a significant public concern related to freedom and civil liberties. The tone is assertive, emphasizing the right to live without military occupation.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions, as it focuses on the concept of freedom rather than attacking individuals or groups. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding of the issue by highlighting the contrast between freedom and military occupation, encouraging empathy for those affected. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in dialogue by responding to a question about freedom, without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech by responsibly using the platform to discuss a public issue with integrity. [+1]