Marianne Williamson

Rank 15 of 47
|
Score 70
8/12/2025, 2:42:26 AM
X
In reply to:
Von RB
@vonrustbelt
·
108d
@marwilliamson You should move to some of these high crime neighborhoods to better understand. You think you're empathetic but you're actually supporting black youth dying on the altar of secular progressivism to confirm your world view wholly disjointed from reality.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
108d
What is a nice word for the military occupation of American cities?
Whatever it might be, it’s the opposite of freedom.
NewsWire
@NewsWire_US
·
109d
TRUMP ON WASHINGTON, DC: WE WILL BRING IN MILITARY IF NEEDED

TRUMP: GOING TO LOOK AT NEW YORK, CHICAGO

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the deployment of the National Guard in high-crime neighborhoods, a public issue related to law enforcement and community safety. The tone is sarcastic and critical, suggesting skepticism about the effectiveness and gratitude of such measures.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses sarcasm, which can be seen as dismissive and potentially harmful, as it trivializes the concerns of those affected by the issue. This violates the principle of striving to do no harm with words. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but the sarcastic tone could be perceived as disrespectful to the dignity of those involved, particularly the communities mentioned. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it uses sarcasm to criticize the situation, which may hinder constructive dialogue. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It uses sarcasm instead of addressing the argument directly, which could be seen as a form of personal attack on the original poster's viewpoint. [-1]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement does not acknowledge or correct any mistakes, as it is a response to another's comment rather than a standalone assertion.
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement does not use influence for societal betterment, as it focuses on criticism rather than proposing solutions or fostering understanding.
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech but does not use the platform responsibly to foster constructive dialogue.