Marianne Williamson

Rank 15 of 47

Score 70

@Passionpower If a Grand Jury brings a case to trial and a jury of someone's peers convicts him, that's not "bending the rules." Was there some prosecutorial overreach with DJT? Yeah, I think there was. But not with all of it. The man has a criminal record with is casinos, unpaid workers, fake

8/12/2025, 1:28:22 PM

In reply to:

Carrie Wynne

@Passionpower

108d

@marwilliamson Too many watched how the law and judges and politicians bending the rules and went after Trump. Now payback.

Marianne Williamson

@marwilliamson

109d

When the government says it has to “go after” a democratically elected city council “and their absurd laws,” we are so in trouble.

The Bulwark

@BulwarkOnline

109d

Jeanine Pirro: "We need to go after the D.C. Council and their absurd laws."

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the legal proceedings involving a public figure and the concept of prosecutorial overreach. It acknowledges the legal process while expressing an opinion on its fairness.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement attempts to clarify the legal process, which can contribute to public understanding, but it also implies bias in the legal system, which could be seen as harmful. [-1]
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
The statement respects privacy by not engaging in personal attacks, but it does critique the legal process and actions of public figures.
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive criticism by acknowledging potential prosecutorial overreach while also defending the legal process. [+1]