Peter Diamandis

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 93
8/15/2025, 3:19:03 PM
X
In reply to:
Peter H. Diamandis, MD
@PeterDiamandis
·
154d
If education is to survive the AI revolution, we must shift from:

“What do you know?” → “What can you build?”

Knowledge may be free—but the ability to create, adapt, and iterate remains rare.
Peter H. Diamandis, MD
@PeterDiamandis
·
154d
Design with agency in mind.

Avoid passive learning. Use design environments—like MIT’s FutureMakers (AI design program)—that empower students to build responsibly.
Peter H. Diamandis, MD
@PeterDiamandis
·
154d
Teach ethical and critical AI literacy, not fear.

Children must understand how AI thinks—and why it fails. Literacy means building, evaluating, and reflecting on AI tools.
Peter H. Diamandis, MD
@PeterDiamandis
·
154d
Encourage self-reflection cycles.

After each build: ask “What went well? What failed? What will you do differently?” This cultivates resilience and deeper learning.
Peter H. Diamandis, MD
@PeterDiamandis
·
154d
Mentor and co-create, don’t lecture.

AI should be a creative partner—not a shortcut. Google DeepMind’s Stefania Druga taught children using AI in tools like Cognimates to build games and train models—not just get answers.
Peter H. Diamandis, MD
@PeterDiamandis
·
154d
Use real-world stakes, not just grades.

Students at @tksworldhq partner with organizations like Microsoft, UN Women, and Shell—experiencing feedback and deadlines that matter

The statement is part of a broader conversation about education and the role of agency in learning, particularly in the context of AI. It contributes to public discourse by engaging with educational strategies and the importance of fostering creativity and critical thinking in students.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm and is focused on promoting educational strategies. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It promotes understanding and empathy by encouraging deeper engagement with educational concepts. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages constructively with the ideas presented by Peter Diamandis, without personal attacks. [+1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    It uses influence to advocate for educational improvement, which can benefit society. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to responsibly discuss educational reform. [+1]