Waleed Shahid 🪬
@_waleedshahid
·
6d
The statement criticizes former President Trump's actions as a distraction tactic to divert attention from significant issues like the Epstein files and a budget bill. It suggests that these actions are part of an authoritarian strategy and urges the public to remain focused on these important topics.
- The statement uses strong language ('fake manufactured crisis', 'authoritarian playbook') which could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm with words. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement aims to promote understanding and awareness of important issues (Epstein files, budget bill) by encouraging continued discussion, aligning with the principle of promoting understanding. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue or criticism but rather makes a strong accusation against Trump, which could be seen as a personal attack, thus violating this principle. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By urging the public to focus on significant issues, the statement attempts to use influence for societal betterment, aligning with this principle. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech by critiquing public actions and encouraging civic engagement, aligning with responsible use of a platform. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.