Reposted by Rashida Tlaib
Dan Rosenzweig-Ziff
@DanRosZiff
·
5d
The statement highlights a confrontation between law enforcement and a bystander, focusing on the lack of transparency and professionalism. The bystander's comment reflects frustration with perceived governmental actions, while the agent's response introduces a political bias. The situation raises concerns about accountability and professionalism in law enforcement.
- The agent's response could be seen as harmful by introducing political bias, which may escalate tensions. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The refusal to identify the agency violates transparency and accountability, potentially disrespecting the public's right to know. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The exchange lacks empathy and understanding, as it devolves into a political argument rather than addressing the bystander's concerns. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The interaction is not constructive and involves personal attacks, failing to engage in meaningful dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.