Jill Stien

Rank 37 of 47
|
Score -79

The statement is a critique of a public figure's alleged comments on a significant geopolitical issue, namely the relationship between the U.S. and Russia, and the implications of election interference. It also comments on the state of the U.S. left, suggesting a broader political critique.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language like 'wage war' and 'completely cooked,' which could be seen as inflammatory and potentially harmful, violating the principle of doing no harm. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but the use of hyperbolic language could be seen as disrespectful to the individuals and groups mentioned. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it uses dismissive language towards a political group. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it uses a sweeping generalization about the U.S. left without providing a nuanced argument. [-2]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that may not be responsible or constructive, given the lack of evidence or context provided. [-1]