Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement accuses UN Watch of misrepresenting FranceskAlbs' words to distract from alleged actions by Israel in Gaza. It uses strong language and implies manipulation and dishonesty.
- The statement uses charged language, which may not align with striving to do no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It accuses UN Watch of dishonesty, potentially impacting their reputation, which may not respect their dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, focusing instead on accusation. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue, opting for a confrontational tone. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.