Reposted by Robert Costa
The statement discusses Jeanine Pirro's role in the federal takeover of DC law enforcement, highlighting her transition from a media position to a political role. It mentions her contempt for her predecessor, suggesting a critical tone towards her actions and attitudes. This constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues related to law enforcement and political dynamics.
- The statement does not directly harm with words, but the mention of 'showing contempt' could be seen as promoting a negative tone, which slightly violates the principle of doing no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity to some extent but could be seen as bordering on disrespect by highlighting contempt for a predecessor, which may not fully respect the dignity of others. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it focuses on personal contempt rather than addressing specific policy disagreements or engaging in a constructive manner. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.