In reply to:
Alana Stewart
@AlanaKStewart
·
165d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the practicality of requiring birth certificates for voter registration, a public policy issue. The tone is critical and challenges the notion of 'common sense' in the context of voter ID laws.
- The statement does not cause harm and raises a practical concern about accessibility, aligning with the principle. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By questioning the practicality of the requirement, it promotes understanding and empathy for those who may not have easy access to their birth certificates. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism without personal attacks, adhering to this principle. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.