Michael Schellenberger

Rank 40 of 47
|
Score -95
8/20/2025, 5:17:08 PM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
170d
@algore The list of everything they lied about is long:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
589d
They said climate change was making wildfires more intense.

In truth, better forest management to reduce wood fuel accumulation makes them less intense, even with hotter temperatures, as everyone always knew:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
170d
.@algore should apologize for lying to billions of people about climate change, islands, and arctic sea ice, which he said would likely disappear over ten years ago. He gave climate anxiety to millions of children.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
170d
They lied about the growing coral on the Great Barrier Reef and got Facebook to censor Australia's top scientist on the issue.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
170d
Most self-appointed fact-checkers are liars. They spread disinformation and then demanded censorship on the basis of it. They did this with everything from the Hunter Biden Laptop to transgenderism to the Great Barrier Reef. They should be shut down.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
170d
In response to "fact checkers," Facebook last year banned @EpochTimes for saying arctic sea ice wasn't declining. But @EpochTimes was right. Even @guardian now admits it. Mark Zuckerberg @finkd — you owe an apology to everyone you censored.

The statement and its context engage in public discourse by discussing climate change, media representation, and censorship. The tone is critical and accusatory, suggesting misinformation and censorship by media and public figures.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement accuses others of lying and censorship, which could be seen as harmful if not substantiated. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It challenges the integrity of public figures and organizations, potentially affecting their dignity. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, focusing instead on accusations. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement lacks constructive dialogue, opting for personal attacks and broad accusations. [-2]