Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement addresses a public issue concerning the reporting of security vulnerabilities related to a public figure, which is a matter of public interest and debate. It involves a defense of journalistic practices against accusations of endangering security, thus engaging in public discourse.
- The statement defends the integrity of the reporting, suggesting no harm was intended, but does not directly address the potential harm caused by the publication of sensitive details. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does not address the privacy concerns raised by the accusation of publishing sensitive security details. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but rather defends the publication's actions, which aligns with constructive dialogue. However, it does not directly engage with the opposing viewpoint in a detailed manner. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech by defending the publication's right to report on matters of public interest, but it does not address the responsibility aspect concerning the potential risks of publishing sensitive information. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.