In reply to:
Rachel Coyle
@RachelCoyleOhio
·
23d
The statement expresses a willingness to engage with diverse perspectives and improve student outcomes, which aligns with principles of constructive dialogue and promoting understanding. However, it does not directly address the accusation of excluding dissenting voices, which could be seen as avoiding accountability.
- The statement does no harm and promotes inclusivity by welcoming different perspectives. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It promotes understanding and empathy by expressing openness to diverse ideas. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- While it engages in constructive dialogue, it does not directly address the criticism of excluding dissenting voices, which could be seen as avoiding full engagement with the issue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.