The statement lists terms that are considered off-putting to regular voters by the Third Way, a centrist political group. The tone is neutral, presenting the terms without additional commentary. The intent seems to be informative, possibly suggesting a strategic communication approach for political messaging.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could imply that discussing certain social issues is undesirable, which might indirectly discourage open dialogue. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By listing terms related to social justice and identity, it could be seen as dismissive of the issues these terms represent, potentially undermining the dignity of those affected. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it suggests avoiding terms that are important for discussing social issues. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but could be seen as dismissive of certain perspectives, which might not foster constructive dialogue.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.