In reply to:
HannaBanana
@cherzemail
·
163d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
163d
The statement 'No shred of evidence this was ever a problem. Completely made up' is a direct response to a discussion about voting policies, specifically mail-in ballots and voter ID requirements. The tone is dismissive and challenges the claim made by @cherzemail about the need to cancel mail-in ballots due to alleged issues with illegal immigrants. The intent appears to be to refute the argument by asserting that there is no evidence supporting the claim.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but dismisses the opposing view without providing evidence, which could be seen as unconstructive.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion as it dismisses the opposing view without further explanation or evidence. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it dismisses the opposing view without engaging in a meaningful discussion or providing evidence. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.