Rashida Tlaib

Rank 4 of 47
|
Score 217

The statement is a strong, accusatory opinion on a political issue, specifically addressing American politicians' actions regarding foreign policy and military support. It uses charged language to criticize those who have supported arming a state accused of committing atrocities, implying direct responsibility for violence. The statement is part of public discourse as it engages with a significant international issue and criticizes public policy decisions.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses inflammatory language that could incite harm or hostility, violating the principle of striving to do no harm. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The accusatory tone and language could be seen as disrespectful and potentially harmful, bordering on hate speech against politicians, thus violating the principle of respecting dignity. [-2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, instead opting for personal attacks, violating this principle. [-2]
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    While the statement exercises free speech, it does so in a manner that lacks responsibility and integrity, as it uses charged language without fostering constructive dialogue. [-1]