Marianne Williamson

Rank 21 of 47
|
Score 44
8/26/2025, 2:12:28 AM
X
In reply to:
Kate Johnson
@kaideejay
·
89d
@marwilliamson Ask Barack Obama. He specifically bragged about having a phone and a pen he could use to implement his agenda if Congress wouldn’t. And he did!

Every president since the founding of America has done this.

Executive orders have limitations and can be challenged in courts and
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
89d
Since when is the President of the United States simply able to say what’s legal and not? State and federal legislators make laws; not the chief executive.1/2

The statement is part of a public discourse on the powers of the U.S. President, specifically regarding the use of executive orders. The tone is critical and suggests that the current President, like past Presidents, uses executive orders extensively.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm others but implies criticism of the President's actions, which is a common aspect of political discourse.
  2. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism of the President's actions but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, maintaining a focus on the issue of executive orders. [+1]
  3. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement contributes to a discussion on presidential powers, which is a relevant public issue, and uses the platform to express a viewpoint responsibly. [+1]