Michael Schellenberger

Rank 40 of 47

Score -95

The scientist, who has decades of experience researching the marine environments of the East Coast, said, “From my lab, I can see the turbines 20 miles from here at Revolution Wind. I’m familiar with the ocean in this area and have been out there a lot. It’s not uncommon for us

8/26/2025, 4:42:13 PM

In reply to:

Michael Shellenberger

@shellenberger

163d

“If you were to ask a marine mammal scientist where we shouldn’t put offshore wind energy, they would say this area,” said the scientist, referring to the Revolution Wind project. “It’s what we call a ‘magical space’ for marine animals. We have a dozen marine mammal species and

Michael Shellenberger

@shellenberger

163d

The scientist who authored the report works for the U.S. government’s National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), which is also known as NOAA Fisheries. It is part of the Department of Commerce, and which serves in an advisory capacity to the Department of the Interior on marine

Michael Shellenberger

@shellenberger

163d

For years, the Biden Administration insisted that offshore wind energy projects complied with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the 1970 law that requires government agencies to use the best available science to evaluate the ecological impacts of major projects before

Michael Shellenberger

@shellenberger

163d

Industrial wind energy doesn't kill whales, insisted the media. But a new report by a top government scientist reveals that the Biden admin. broke the law in approving Empire Wind, while Revolution Wind is in a crucial "magical space for marine animals" at risk of extinction.

The statement and accompanying images engage in public discourse by discussing the environmental impact of offshore wind projects on marine life, particularly in a sensitive area. The conversation highlights concerns about compliance with environmental laws and the potential risks to endangered species.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement raises awareness about potential environmental harm, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
By discussing the impact on marine life, it promotes understanding and empathy for environmental conservation. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive criticism of government actions, avoiding personal attacks. [+1]
Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
It uses the platform to advocate for better environmental practices, aiming for societal betterment. [+1]