The statement addresses a contentious political issue, alleging suppression of activism related to divestment from Israel and support for Palestine. It uses strong language, such as 'genocide' and 'violent suppression,' which can be polarizing. The intent is to rally support against perceived injustices by university officials.
- The statement uses charged language that could contribute to harm by escalating tensions. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It accuses university officials of 'slander' and 'surveillance,' potentially impacting their dignity without providing evidence. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding and empathy for the Palestinian cause but does so in a confrontational manner.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and instead makes strong accusations against the university. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.