In reply to:
Dakota Meyer
@Dakota_Meyer
·
17d
The statement is part of a public discourse about media reporting and the use of correct pronouns, which are significant societal issues. The conversation involves a critique of media practices and the importance of respecting individuals' gender identities.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but is part of a broader conversation that could impact perceptions of media responsibility.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy by quoting a public document, but the broader conversation involves sensitive topics that require careful handling to avoid harassment or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement itself does not promote understanding or empathy, but it is part of a dialogue that could lead to greater awareness of gender identity issues.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of media practices, which can be constructive if done respectfully. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.