In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
160d
The statement discusses a significant political action involving the revocation of security clearances related to a past intelligence assessment. It implies misconduct and political maneuvering within intelligence agencies, suggesting a lack of transparency and accountability. The tone is critical and accusatory, aiming to highlight perceived issues within the intelligence community.
- The statement could potentially cause harm by accusing individuals and agencies of misconduct without providing evidence, which may damage reputations. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It challenges the privacy and dignity of those involved by publicly discussing sensitive security clearance issues. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on accusations and blame. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in criticism but lacks constructive dialogue, focusing instead on allegations and personal attacks. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.