In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
159d
The statement critiques the disqualification of a mayoral candidate based on seemingly trivial actions, suggesting a misuse of power by election authorities. It implies a broader issue of democratic integrity in Europe, framing it as a threat to democracy and linking it to radical-left totalitarianism.
- The statement aims to highlight potential harm caused by election authorities' actions, aligning with the principle of doing no harm by advocating for fair democratic processes. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy but could be seen as engaging in hyperbolic language that might not fully respect the dignity of those involved. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding of the issue by bringing attention to it, but the tone may lack empathy and compassion.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of the authorities, but the language used could be seen as inflammatory, potentially violating the principle of constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to raise awareness about a perceived democratic issue, aligning with the principle of using influence for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.