In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
159d
The statement critiques the disqualification of a mayoral candidate for seemingly trivial reasons, suggesting it undermines democratic principles. It implies a misuse of power and questions the integrity of the electoral process.
- The statement aims to highlight potential harm in the electoral process, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy but challenges the actions of authorities, which could be seen as a form of constructive criticism rather than harassment. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by questioning the fairness of the disqualification. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in constructive criticism of the election authorities without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to advocate for democratic integrity, aligning with societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.