Marianne Williamson

Rank 21 of 47
|
Score 38
8/30/2025, 3:01:07 PM
X
In reply to:
Zeke the TeraBull
@HamblinZeke
·
83d
@marwilliamson @YouTube Trump was democratically elected.

He has the support of the majority of Americans.

It is beneath you to mischaracterize him as a fascist.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
84d
@HamblinZeke @YouTube Of course truth is more complex than left versus right. President Eisenhower said “the American mind that is best is both liberal and conservative”. I think that’s true. And anyone who has listened to me knows how much I’ve criticized the Democratic party. But we’re at a point
Zeke the TeraBull
@HamblinZeke
·
84d
@marwilliamson @YouTube Would you though?

It’s more about all your posts these days.

I say this with love and respect. You’re not required to hate him and life is more complex than left vs right.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
84d
@HamblinZeke @YouTube It’s a video. I would post it if he was a Democrat.
Zeke the TeraBull
@HamblinZeke
·
84d
@marwilliamson @YouTube When I considered myself a democrat, I always admired you as a voice on the left advocating for prioritizing love and humanity over politics.

What has happened that you have become part of the fear/hate machine?
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
84d
This resurfaced 1990 clip of Trump with Barbara Walters... https://www.youtube.com/shorts/n… via @YouTube

The statement engages in a public discourse by addressing the characterization of a political figure, Donald Trump, and comparing his election to that of Adolf Hitler. It challenges the accuracy of claims about Trump's support and the appropriateness of labeling him as a fascist, thus contributing to a broader debate about political rhetoric and historical comparisons.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm with words, but the comparison to Hitler could be seen as inflammatory, potentially causing harm by escalating tensions. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but the comparison to Hitler could be perceived as disrespectful to those involved in the discourse. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it uses a provocative comparison that may hinder constructive dialogue. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in dialogue by challenging the claims made by another user, but the comparison to Hitler could be seen as a form of personal attack or ad hominem argument, detracting from constructive criticism. [-2]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement does not acknowledge or correct any mistakes, as it is focused on refuting another user's claims.
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement does not explicitly use influence for societal betterment, as it focuses on refuting claims rather than proposing solutions.
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech by engaging in a public debate, but the integrity of the discourse is compromised by the provocative comparison.