In reply to:
Matt Lieberman🇺🇦
@social_brains
·
9d
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the societal implications of large language models (LLMs) and artificial general intelligence (AGI). It critiques the notion that LLMs are the most consequential invention, highlighting potential negative impacts such as nonconsensual deep fake porn, mass disinformation, environmental harm, and the rise of oligarchy.
- The statement highlights potential harms of LLMs, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm by raising awareness of these issues. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, and respects the privacy and dignity of others. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- By discussing the cons of LLMs, the statement promotes understanding of potential negative impacts, aligning with the principle of promoting understanding and empathy. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the view that LLMs are highly beneficial, without resorting to personal attacks. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to discuss societal issues related to technology, contributing to the betterment of society by raising awareness. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly discussing the implications of LLMs and AGI. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.