Marianne Williamson

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 45
8/30/2025, 9:53:14 PM
X
In reply to:
Zeke the TeraBull
@HamblinZeke
·
83d
@marwilliamson @YouTube What is the alternative?

Trump started his term asking people to self-deport. Cleary those still here have not.

How is it fair to everyone trying to immigrate here legally that all these people bypassed the process?

Why do you have more sympathy for rule-breakers than those
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
83d
@HamblinZeke @YouTube Not now they don't. They were played and most of them know it.

There's nothing lawful, orderly and just about ripping people from their homes, cars, streets, places of work and worship without due process. That's the ABSENCE of law, order and justice.
Zeke the TeraBull
@HamblinZeke
·
83d
@marwilliamson @YouTube Why to legal latino residents side overwhelmingly with Trump on immigration?

It’s not about racism; it’s about law, order, and justice.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
83d
@HamblinZeke @YouTube The treatment of Jews in Germany did not begin with calling for their total eradication. But it damn sure began with treatment much like Latino immigrants are receiving here today. I say this in the spirit of respecful dialogue, because I'm grateful you're giving me the change to
Zeke the TeraBull
@HamblinZeke
·
83d
@marwilliamson @YouTube This Hitler comparison has got to stop. Trump is not calling for the eradication of any peoples; and is clearly a person who values peace and prosperity over war and conquest.

Marianne.. the social fabric of the world is being torn apart at the seams and you are too
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
83d
@HamblinZeke @YouTube <<Trump was democratically elected>> So was Hitler.
<<He has the support of the majority of Americans>> According to current polls, no he doesn't. <<It is beneath you to mischaracterize him as a fascist>> It would be beneath me to deny what's happening. You realize I'd be more

The statement is part of a public discourse on immigration policies and the actions of former President Donald Trump. It engages in a debate about the fairness and legality of immigration enforcement and criticizes Trump's legal issues, questioning the sympathy shown towards him.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm others but could be seen as inflammatory by bringing up Trump's legal issues in a charged manner.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech but could be seen as disrespectful towards Trump by focusing on his legal troubles. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on criticizing Trump rather than fostering dialogue. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in personal attacks by highlighting Trump's legal issues rather than addressing the policy debate constructively. [-2]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but could be more responsible by focusing on policy rather than personal attacks. [-1]