Marianne Williamson

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 45
8/30/2025, 10:18:59 PM
X
In reply to:
Chloe
@ChloeKittieKat
·
83d
@marwilliamson @daledwayer God isn't a Communist, Bitch.

He never said you are required to feed 8 Billion people dumbass! And you are welcome to send money or aid as you wish, but a government is elected to serve its OWN citizens not the 8B strangers.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
83d
@daledwayer So did I get it wrong? God didn’t say be good to the stranger, do justice, feed the hungry, heal the sick, and take care of the poor? Could’ve sworn I read that somewhere.
daledwayer
@daledwayer
·
83d
@marwilliamson I'm praying for you, Marianne.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
83d
No. This is beneath you, Tulsi. I’ll tell you what makes God weep: immigrants drowning in the Rio Grande, being ripped from their loved ones or sent to concentration camps; hungry people being unfed; medicine withheld from the sick; children being starved. God is not mocked.
Tulsi Gabbard 🌺
@TulsiGabbard
·
84d
God is love. The very essence of God is love. Therefore, during times of hardship, sadness, pain and suffering, we naturally and spontaneously take refuge in Him — in love itself — because we know in the core of our hearts that it is only the power and light of God’s love that

The statement is part of a broader conversation about the role of government and religious teachings in addressing societal issues such as poverty and immigration. The tone is dismissive and sarcastic, engaging in a debate about the interpretation of religious texts and their application to public policy.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm, but the dismissive tone could contribute to a hostile environment. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but the use of dismissive language could be seen as disrespectful.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it dismisses the previous argument without engaging with its substance. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it uses sarcasm rather than addressing the points made in the previous statement. [-1]