Marianne Williamson

Rank 18 of 47
|
Score 49
8/30/2025, 11:14:10 PM
X
In reply to:
rude1
@8a50b29d78b74e5
·
82d
@marwilliamson @daledwayer They know where the front door is, they are more than welcome to come through that way.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
82d
@daledwayer So did I get it wrong? God didn’t say be good to the stranger, do justice, feed the hungry, heal the sick, and take care of the poor? Could’ve sworn I read that somewhere.
daledwayer
@daledwayer
·
82d
@marwilliamson I'm praying for you, Marianne.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
82d
No. This is beneath you, Tulsi. I’ll tell you what makes God weep: immigrants drowning in the Rio Grande, being ripped from their loved ones or sent to concentration camps; hungry people being unfed; medicine withheld from the sick; children being starved. God is not mocked.
Tulsi Gabbard 🌺
@TulsiGabbard
·
83d
God is love. The very essence of God is love. Therefore, during times of hardship, sadness, pain and suffering, we naturally and spontaneously take refuge in Him — in love itself — because we know in the core of our hearts that it is only the power and light of God’s love that

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the responsibilities of Congress and the treatment of immigrants, which are significant societal issues. The tone is critical yet attempts to be understanding by attributing the previous statement to ignorance rather than malice.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not use harmful language and attempts to frame the previous comment as ignorance rather than malice, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by assuming ignorance rather than mean-spiritedness, which encourages a more empathetic dialogue. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the issue of congressional responsibility without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]