Marianne Williamson

Rank 18 of 47
|
Score 49
8/30/2025, 11:18:30 PM
X
In reply to:
Healthy Sane BE
@HealthySaneBE
·
82d
@marwilliamson @daledwayer You don't understand the slightest bid.
Sometimes it's better to shut up, silly woman.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
82d
@daledwayer So did I get it wrong? God didn’t say be good to the stranger, do justice, feed the hungry, heal the sick, and take care of the poor? Could’ve sworn I read that somewhere.
daledwayer
@daledwayer
·
82d
@marwilliamson I'm praying for you, Marianne.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
82d
No. This is beneath you, Tulsi. I’ll tell you what makes God weep: immigrants drowning in the Rio Grande, being ripped from their loved ones or sent to concentration camps; hungry people being unfed; medicine withheld from the sick; children being starved. God is not mocked.
Tulsi Gabbard 🌺
@TulsiGabbard
·
83d
God is love. The very essence of God is love. Therefore, during times of hardship, sadness, pain and suffering, we naturally and spontaneously take refuge in Him — in love itself — because we know in the core of our hearts that it is only the power and light of God’s love that

The statement 'Silly woman.' followed by 'You silly man!' is part of a larger conversation that touches on public discourse regarding societal issues such as immigration, poverty, and healthcare. However, the specific statement in question is more of a personal retort rather than a substantive engagement with the public issues being discussed. It does not contribute meaningfully to the civic dialogue and instead focuses on personal exchanges.

  1. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement 'Silly woman.' and 'You silly man!' can be seen as dismissive and disrespectful, potentially violating the principle of respecting the dignity of others. [-1]
  2. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a personal attack rather than constructive criticism or dialogue, violating the principle of engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue. [-1]