In reply to:
The statement is a response to a conversation about a debunked article and its impact on a public figure's following. It engages with the public issue of media influence and misinformation, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies a negative impact ('political roadkill'), which could be seen as insensitive. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the term 'political roadkill' could be interpreted as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue and instead uses a metaphor that could be perceived as a personal attack. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.