Marianne Williamson

Rank 18 of 47
|
Score 55
8/31/2025, 1:33:18 AM
X
In reply to:
Chloe
@ChloeKittieKat
·
81d
@annaf788 @marwilliamson @daledwayer even tho it violates our laws means we aren't obligated to help those who make the decision to break our laws. If they drown in the Rio it's their own fault. Darwinism. Under Trump, we don't have that, because they aren't given false hope. It's also stopped child trafficking.
Chloe
@ChloeKittieKat
·
81d
@annaf788 @marwilliamson @daledwayer Sure. I have no issue with that AT ALL! As long as they aren't helping them break laws, like hiding illegals, or using other people's money to do that without their permission, which is why the Govt shouldn't unless the majority vote for it. Telling illegals then can come in here
Anna
@annaf788
·
81d
@ChloeKittieKat @marwilliamson @daledwayer Grateful for those who help others.
Chloe
@ChloeKittieKat
·
81d
@marwilliamson @daledwayer God isn't a Communist, Bitch.

He never said you are required to feed 8 Billion people dumbass! And you are welcome to send money or aid as you wish, but a government is elected to serve its OWN citizens not the 8B strangers.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
81d
@daledwayer So did I get it wrong? God didn’t say be good to the stranger, do justice, feed the hungry, heal the sick, and take care of the poor? Could’ve sworn I read that somewhere.
daledwayer
@daledwayer
·
81d
@marwilliamson I'm praying for you, Marianne.

The statement 'Wow. May I ask where your ancestors came from?' is a response in a heated discussion about immigration and government responsibility. The tone appears to be sarcastic or confrontational, potentially questioning the legitimacy of the previous speaker's stance by implying they too are descendants of immigrants. This statement engages with public discourse as it touches on immigration, a significant societal issue.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm, but its sarcastic tone could be perceived as dismissive or belittling, which may indirectly contribute to a hostile environment. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The question about ancestry could be seen as disrespectful or invasive, potentially violating the privacy and dignity of others. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. Instead, it seems to be a personal attack or an ad hominem argument, questioning the legitimacy of the speaker based on their ancestry rather than addressing the argument itself. [-2]