Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement involves a discussion on AI governance, reasoning, ethics, and the path to AGI, which are significant public issues. It suggests a substantive engagement with these topics, contributing to civic dialogue.
- The discussion appears to aim at understanding and addressing the ethical implications of AI, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The conversation promotes understanding and empathy by exploring the capabilities and limitations of AI. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- Engaging in dialogue about AI governance and ethics suggests constructive criticism and dialogue. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.