Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
309d
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
156d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
158d
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the potential prevention of a political candidate from running for office, which raises concerns about democratic processes and freedom of political expression. It implies that such actions are undemocratic and compares them to totalitarianism, suggesting a violation of democratic principles.
- The statement suggests harm by implying that democratic processes are being undermined, which could incite fear or distrust. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy but could be seen as disrespecting the dignity of those involved by labeling actions as totalitarian without detailed evidence. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and instead makes strong accusations without providing a balanced view. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- It uses its platform to raise awareness about potential democratic issues but does so in a way that could be seen as alarmist.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.