In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
156d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
309d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
156d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
158d
The statement suggests using censorship and prosecution against political opposition to 'save democracy,' which is inherently contradictory and provocative. It implies a critique of current political actions in Europe, particularly regarding the treatment of populist candidates. The accompanying image of George Orwell adds a layer of irony, referencing Orwell's critiques of totalitarianism.
- The statement violates the principle of doing no harm by advocating for actions that could undermine democratic processes. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It disrespects the privacy and dignity of political opposition by suggesting their censorship and prosecution. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and instead promotes a divisive and aggressive stance. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- It uses influence to potentially harm societal values of democracy and free speech. [-2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement violates the principles of free speech by advocating for censorship and prosecution of opposition. [-2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.