Marianne Williamson

Rank 16 of 47
|
Score 76
8/31/2025, 6:28:07 PM
X
In reply to:
Jim
@jmacken2013
路
1d
@helencaddes @katewillett Any time Marianne Williamson pops up in my feed I tell her to kick rocks.

She is bad, and she should feel bad. And anyone who supports her should also feel bad.
Helen Caddes 馃敟
@helencaddes
路
1d
@jmacken2013 @katewillett Then why don't you "bully" one of them?
Jim
@jmacken2013
路
1d
@katewillett Bullying anti-science grifters is good actually.
Kate Willett
@katewillett
路
1d
On their website, Organizer Memes sells their services as a professional bully. I'm not against online dragging (obviously) but you can't be a LITERAL PROFESSIONAL BULLY and complain when someone posts your DNC payday receipts.

A paid bully!! Do it for the love of the game.

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the behavior and influence of a public figure, Marianne Williamson, and the ethics of online behavior. The tone is critical and somewhat mocking, questioning the motivations behind supporting Williamson.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement violates the principle of doing no harm by using derogatory language and perpetuating negative stereotypes.聽[-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It disrespects privacy and dignity by engaging in cyberbullying and potentially spreading misinformation.聽[-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, instead fostering division and ridicule.聽[-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    It fails to engage in constructive criticism, opting for personal attacks rather than reasoned dialogue.聽[-2]