Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 115
8/31/2025, 7:37:21 PM
X
In reply to:
Ali Mortazavi
@AAMortazavi
·
12d
@plibin @GaryMarcus I agree, I’m not trying to let them off the hook… it’s very clear to me that this generation of transformer models has serious flaws. Are we just saying that OpenAI is grossly overvalued?! Is that the game? Fine if it is
Phil Libin
@plibin
·
12d
@AAMortazavi @GaryMarcus I think both are interesting: what we can get out of them now, and how can we measure progress on things they’re not good at yet.
Ali Mortazavi
@AAMortazavi
·
12d
@plibin @GaryMarcus Not really.. its Achilles heels are well known, no need to keep tapping them. The interesting thing is what we can get out of them?
Phil Libin
@plibin
·
12d
@AAMortazavi @GaryMarcus Admittedly, this is a casual benchmark designed to be hard for image generation to get right. That’s how we can measure progress.
Ali Mortazavi
@AAMortazavi
·
12d
@GaryMarcus Come on, you’re trying to trip it up on purpose now… use it for what it’s good at?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
12d
🎺 Presenting The Libin Image Generation Benchmark 🎺

How well can your favorite model do?

“A realistic closeup image of a bookshelf with exactly seventeen books of varying sizes. The titles and authors should all be clearly legible and be real English books. No title should

The statement is part of a discussion on the limitations and potential of transformer models, specifically in the context of AI and image generation. The tone is casual and slightly humorous, acknowledging the flaws while emphasizing the pursuit of scientific progress.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and maintains a neutral tone. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It promotes understanding by acknowledging the limitations of current models while focusing on scientific progress. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    Engages in constructive dialogue without personal attacks. [+1]