Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47

Score 115

-3

@DeryaTR_ More misinformation from you. Consider for example Kevin Roose at NYT who very rarely says a negative word about AI, and who is writing a book about who AGI being imminent.

9/1/2025, 3:03:13 PM

In reply to:

Derya Unutmaz, MD

@DeryaTR_

13d

In my opinion, the Wall Street Journal is one of the significant sources of misinformation about AI. Traditional media in general are not happy about the advancement of AI; you can guess why.

Andrew Mayne

@AndrewMayne

13d

Reading this headline you’d never realize that GPT-5-nano, a far more capable model than GPT-3 is a 1000x cheaper per input token.

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of media representation of AI advancements. It criticizes a specific individual's perceived bias and suggests misinformation in media coverage.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement could be seen as harmful by accusing someone of spreading misinformation without providing evidence, potentially damaging reputations. [-1]
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
It does not respect the privacy and dignity of the individual mentioned, as it accuses them of bias without substantiation. [-1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement lacks constructive criticism and engages in a personal attack rather than fostering dialogue. [-1]