Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 115
9/1/2025, 5:30:21 PM
X
In reply to:
Nicko Stark
@CogniStark
·
13d
@GaryMarcus Amen to that
There's an ugly scarcity of data for those who are trying to do sth aboutit but aren't actually at the "senior researcher" position.
The publicly available ones don't often meet the requirements of the research questions
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
14d
Three thoughts on what really matters:

1. Fuck cancer
2. Friends are irreplaceable
3. The new "Marcus test" for AI is when AI makes a significant dent on cancer

May that happen sooner, much sooner, rather than later.

In memory of my childhood friend Paul.

The statement critiques the role of data and associated greed in hindering research progress, particularly in the context of AI's potential impact on cancer research.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm others but implies criticism of systemic issues related to data access and greed.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement indirectly promotes understanding by highlighting issues in data accessibility that affect research progress. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of systemic issues without personal attacks. [+1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to highlight a societal issue, potentially encouraging dialogue on data accessibility. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement responsibly uses free speech to address a public concern about data accessibility in research. [+1]