Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 115
Dr. Émile P. Torres
@xriskology
·
13d
Exactly. One longer-term consequence of all the apocalyptic hype is that when/if tech really does threaten humanity, no one's going to listen. Docs like "AI 2027" will become the "Population Bomb" of the 21st century, which will make people take future warnings less seriously...
9/1/2025, 8:08:10 PM
X

The statement and the conversation it refers to engage in a discussion about the impact of exaggerated claims regarding existential risks (x-risks) and their potential to undermine serious discourse on the topic. The tone is critical and aims to highlight the negative consequences of sensationalism in discussions about technology and its risks.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but criticizes actions that could lead to harm by undermining serious discourse on existential risks.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement aims to promote understanding by pointing out the dangers of sensationalism, but it could be more empathetic in its approach. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of the way existential risks are discussed, but it could be seen as indirectly attacking those who sensationalize these risks. [-1]