The statement and image engage in public discourse by discussing international relations and policy, specifically the EU's Digital Services Act and its implications for US-EU relations. The tone is confrontational, suggesting aggressive diplomatic and economic measures to counter the EU's regulations.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement advocates for aggressive actions that could harm diplomatic relations, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm.
 [-2]Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.The language used is confrontational and lacks respect for the EU's regulatory decisions, potentially violating the principle of respecting others' dignity.
 [-1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue but rather suggests coercive measures, violating the principle of constructive criticism and dialogue.
 [-2]Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.The statement uses influence to promote a specific agenda, but the aggressive tone may not align with societal betterment.
 [-1]